How political parties frame European integration
Corresponding Author
MARC HELBLING
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Germany;
Marc Helbling, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Reichpietschufer 50, D–10785 Berlin-Tiergarten, Germany. Tel.: +49 (0)30 254 91 449; E-mail: [email protected]; Homepage: http://www.marc-helbling.chSearch for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
MARC HELBLING
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Germany;
Marc Helbling, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Reichpietschufer 50, D–10785 Berlin-Tiergarten, Germany. Tel.: +49 (0)30 254 91 449; E-mail: [email protected]; Homepage: http://www.marc-helbling.chSearch for more papers by this authorAbstract
This article analyses how political parties frame European integration, and gauges the consistency of their argumentation. Over the course of investigation, one can see how actors' positions are justified, and how the European Union is perceived (i.e., what forces give rise to Euroscepticism and Europeanism). It is argued here that the parties' framing of issues depends on the interests they traditionally defend at the national level, their general positions on European integration, and whether or not they belong to the established political actors in their respective countries. The coding approach enables the relation of frames to actors and positions, moving beyond the techniques employed by existing studies that analyse the media presentation of European integration. Sophisticated frame categorisations are provided to capture the complex structure of argumentation, going beyond a simple dichotomy of economic and cultural frames. Relying on a large and original media dataset covering the period 2004–2006, six Western European countries are investigated.
References
- Bennett, W.L. et al. (2004). Managing the public sphere: Journalistic construction of the great globalization debate. Journal of Communication 54(3): 437–455.
- Brewer, P.R. & Gross, K. (2005). Values, framing and citizens' thoughts about policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology 26(6): 929–948.
- Chong, D. & Druckman, J.N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication 57(1): 99–118.
- Conti, N. (2003). Party attitudes to European integration: A longitudinal analysis of the Italian case. SEI Working Paper 70. Brighton: Sussex European Institute.
- Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 14(4): 654–666.
- De Vreese, C.H. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant.
- De Vreese, C.H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design 13(1): 48–59.
- De Vreese, C.H., Peter, J. & Semetko, H.A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication 18: 107–122.
-
Diez Medrano, J. (2003). Framing Europe: Attitudes to European integration in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400832576 Google Scholar
- Earl, J. et al. (2004). The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 65–80.
- Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.
-
Ferree, M.M. et al. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511613685 Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
- Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Helbling, M & Tresch, A. (2009). Measuring Party Positions and Issue Salience from Media Coverage: Discussing and Crossvalidating New Indicators. Unpublished article manuscript.
-
Hix, S. &
Lord, C. (1997). Political parties in the European Union. New York: St Martin's Press.
10.1007/978-1-349-25560-3 Google Scholar
- Hix, S. & Marsh, M. (2007). Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. Journal of Politics 69(2): 495–510.
- Hooghe, L. (2007). What drives Euroskepticism? Party-public cuing, ideology and strategic opportunity. European Union Politics 8(1): 5–12.
- Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2006). Europe's blues: Theoretical soul searching after the rejection of the European Constitution. PS: Political Science & Politics 39(2): 247–250.
- Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctional theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.
-
Hooghe, L.,
Marks, G. &
Wilson, C.J. (2004). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?
In
G. Marks &
M.R. Steenbergen (eds), European integration and political conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511492013.008 Google Scholar
- Kleinnijenhuis, J., De Ridder, J.A. & Rietberg, E.M. (1997). Reasoning in economic discourse: An application of the network approach to the Dutch press. In C.W. Roberts (ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Koopmans, R. (2007). Who inhabits the European public sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanised political debates. European Journal of Political Research 46(2): 183–210.
- Koopmans, R. & Statham, P. (1999). Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization 4(1): 40–51.
- Kriesi, H. (2007). The role of European integration in national election campaigns. European Union Politics 8(1): 83–108.
- Kriesi, H. et al. (2005). Der Aufstieg der SVP. Acht Kantone im Vergleich. Zürich: NZZ.
- Kriesi, H. et al. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921–956.
-
Kriesi, H. et al. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511790720 Google Scholar
- Lerch, M. & Schwellnus, G. (2006). Normative by nature? The role of coherence in justifying the EU's external human rights policy. Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 304–321.
- Lombard, M., Snyder-Dutch, J. & Bracken, C.C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessments and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research 28(4): 587–604.
- Mair, P. (2007). Political parties and party systems. In P. Graziano & M.P. Vink (eds), Europeanization: New research agendas. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Marks, G. (2004). Conclusion: European integration and political conflict. In
G. Marks &
M.R. Steenbergen (eds), European integration and political conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511492013.013 Google Scholar
-
Marks, G. &
Steenbergen, M.R. (2004). European integration and political conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511492013 Google Scholar
- Marks, G. & Wilson, C. (2000). The past in the present: A cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science 30(3): 433–459.
- Marsh, M. (1998). Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 591–607.
- Matthes, J. (2007). Framing-Effekte. Zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Einstellungen der Rezipienten. München: Fischer.
-
McLaren, L. (2006). Identity, interests and attitudes to European integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1057/9780230504240 Google Scholar
- Menendez-Alarcon, A.V. (2004). The cultural realm of European integration: Social representations in France, Spain and the United Kingdom. Westport, CT: Praeger.
- Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rucht, D. & Neidhardt, F. (1998). Methodological issues in collecting protest event data: Units of analysis, sources and sampling, coding problems. In D. Rucht, R. Koopmans & F. Neidhardt (eds), Acts of dissent: New developments in the study of protest. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
- Sjursen, H. (2002). Why expand? The question of legitimacy and justification in the EU's enlargement policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 40(3): 491–513.
- Statham, P. (2008). Political party contestation over Europe in public discourses: Emergent Euroscepticism? Arena Working Paper 8, March 2008. Available online at: http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2008/papers/wp08_08.xml
-
Statham, P. &
Gray, E. (2005). The public sphere and debates about Europe in Britain: Internalized and conflict driven? Innovation
18(1): 61–81.
10.1080/1351161042000334790 Google Scholar
-
Statham, P. &
Koopmans, R. (2009). Political party contestation over Europe in the mass media: Who criticizes Europe, how and why?
European Political Science Review
1(3): 435–463.
10.1017/S1755773909990154 Google Scholar
- Trenz, H.-J. (2005). Europa in den Medien. Die Europäische Integration im Spiegel nationaler Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
- Van Os, R. (2005). Framing Europe online: French political parties and the European election of 2004. Information Polity 10: 205–218.
- Vliegenthart, R. (2007). Framing immigration and integration: Facts, parliament, media and anti-immigration party support in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Free University.
-
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origin of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511818691 Google Scholar